Pin it! 
elsueco likes this
Watched this last night. Pitiful performance by Ken Ham who never once answered any of the fundamental questions posed to him by Bill Nye. Instead he hid behind the moderator and the structure of the debate, cowering and clutching at his erroneous assumption that "observational science" is in some way different than "historical science." Laughable!
Added in Intellect
1 comment
Login to comment →
elsueco 10 years, 2 months ago
Ham was pathetic and blatantly evading even the simplest question.
Kudos to Nye for bringing his trademark calm demeanor into such a hostile environment where not just the opponent, but moderator and audience were opposed to his views.
Kudos to all involved for keeping both sides respectful and professional. These debates are often visceral.
Reply